the world as it’s seen by (Russia): a contextualisation of geopolitics from the certain perspective

lecture performance & installation was presented by Denis Maksimov in December 2015 in Marres House for Contemporary Culture (Maastricht, NL) and in February 2016 in de Brakke Grond Cultural Center (Amsterdam, NL)

image

The Soviet Union collapsed a quarter of a century ago. It marked the biggest geopolitical catastrophe in history: the balance of powers, that was driving progress ahead, was demolished. Since then we live in the world where only one, ultra-capitalistic superpower is dictating the way we consume food, entertainment, information, and everything else. The plurality of choice, which was assured before by the ideological dichotomy between socialism and capitalism, disappeared. This was the biggest geopolitical and ideological catastrophe of the 20 century and the consequences are still to manifest themselves in the upcoming horrors of uncertainly, instability and chaos of international relations.

We tried to integrate into this new reality. We accepted our defeat in the Cold War. We wholeheartedly offered cooperation - converted our political system into West-oriented democracy, allowed capitalism to take over the planned economy, welcomed Western-led international community to enjoy the riches of Russia.

What did we get back?

Neo-colonialist political and economic notations. Expanding NATO, despite your promises to keep it within the same borders. Selfish support of local corruption practices for the sake of short-term revenues by your ‘transnational’ corporations. Instead of helping us to grow new generation of responsible leaders, you have contributed and nurtured oligarchs and cronies, with whom you enjoy nowadays making selfies at couture shows, ‘Art Basel’s and Biennales.

Russia assumed on it’s shoulders sovereign debt of the whole Soviet Union, for the infrastructure that was built in all the corners of the vast territory during more than half a century. Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Ukraine and other newly established ‘nations’ left the Union ‘clean’ of financial obligations and debts because of it. They got their ‘golden tickets’ out, while Russia assumed all the blame and responsibility for economic mismanagement of the Union, which was a common enterprise.

We were promised that NATO will slowly transform into something else than instrument of providing nationalistic, missionary, neo-colonial agenda of the United States. That it will become international organisation focused on peace keeping. Instead of it, already for 20 years we see construction of new military bases around our borders and on the territory of former parts of the Soviet Union and Russian Empire. Instead of peace-keeping, we perceive walling us off. It all happens quietly, with your firm European smile - the same ‘good manners’ were used by you during the centuries of slavery and colonisation of the other parts of our planet. Your snobbism makes us sick. We are shamed by the West for our model of democracy. But think for a second - does your Western model of democracy, as universal as you think about it, works anywhere, even in your hemisphere? Africa is a complete mess precisely because you brought there institutions that are alien to everything that existed there before. France supported dictators in Gabon, Belgium murdered Patrice Lumumba, the UK systemically messed up the Middle East turning it into the geopolitical hellhole. The list is very, very long. 

Your own youths are sick of inequality in capital and power redistribution. They are sick of your usurping elites, hopelessness for the future and postmodern disorientation in moral and ideological values. Our goal is not to replicate your ‘democracy’, but to build solid infrastructure of survival and further development of our own civilisation, not a cheap copy of your failed project. 

We were cornered by you and left with no choice but to play the card of ‘national revival’, to build retrograde walls, because the partnership game you played with us appeared no more than a trick of coloniser, analogy of ‘beads’ provided to indigenous population for lands in America and Africa for their rich lands. And this is your ‘thank you’ for tens of millions of lives we’ve sacrificed to stop advancement of Napoleon and later Hitler? 

Take the issue of the war in Ukraine. It was very corrupt place from the beginning: political infrastructure there is just rotten from the bottom to the very top. Instead of being focused on how to help it to develop and climb out of the systemic crisis, you are focused on taking it out of the ‘Russian sphere of influence’. For years, you actively supported antagonisation of the Ukrainian society towards Russia. When we offered three-partial integration of the economies of Russia, Ukraine and the EU - it was you who declined three-party negotiations prospects, saying that you will deal with each of the partners ‘individually’, therefore disrespecting decades of economic ties that were built between Russia and Ukraine at the times when we shared the same borders. 

You say it’s we are who are reviving the geopolitics and act in the methods of 19th century ‘realpolitik’? But ask yourself, who was muddling cultural ties between Russia and it’s immediate neighbours, which we share with centuries long common history? If you were so keen on and open for cooperation with Russia in the first place, what made you so motivated to develop strategy of weakening strategic positioning of Russia in the Eurasian region? 

Your irresponsible, unwise and selfish actions are the reason why we now look at Asia with a glimpse of hope of building constructive relations, based on mutual interests, benefit and honesty. 

You perfectly know, that like in cosmology there is a dichotomy between Universe and Multiverse, in politics, which is to some extent is cosmology of human mind, also can be seen from multidimensional perspective. Look at ‘democratic’ India and complete devastating mess in there. If you allow Burma’s voters now to exercise their right to freely vote about the rights of Muslim minority, they will massacre all of them. Singapore wouldn’t have been that success story if it followed your ‘democratic patterns’. You own societies are falling into the orbit of almost fascist political groups - Marine le Pen in France, Donald Trump in the United States, and that’s only the beginning. Your short-term oriented, materialistic ’ochlocracy’ is still to unveil all the devastating consequences for your society. Maybe there is still time to re-evaluate your short-sighted, universalist, colonial approach to the world? Maybe you will finally understand, that we don’t live anymore in the world of totalitarian monopoly of your picture of the world and finally will demonstrate some respect to diversity of opinions? 

We don’t fundamentally argue against your concept of the Enlightenment, but we ask for moderation and respect of other cultures. Your snobbish, non- constructive pretence drives our society towards ultra-conservatism as the only alternative, that is strong enough to battle your creepy monopoly over cultural discourse. Do you really think we enjoy it ourselves? 

We still call you ‘partners’. We are open for dialogue. We are not part of the barbaric tribes that undermine ‘the light’ you bring in the world, as you media actively depicts us. We understand, that cooperation (even if not already desirable), is inevitable and vital for both of us in the light of current political changes. But if you continue to act like your position and understanding of the world around us is the only one possible interpretation of reality, we are afraid our orbits will continue to dangerously drift away.

This was posted 5 years ago. It has 0 notes.

Superficial Aesthetics

image

Adrijana Gvozdenovic, Denis Maksimov. "Superficial Aesthetics", installation, the HAL, Antwerp (BE), 2015

One year before meeting each other in Belgium, Denis Maksimov and Adrijana Gvozdenovic both visited Estonian Pavilion at the 55th Venice Biennale Arte and took with them one copy of Denes Farkas white books, which themselves were the part of the larger installation. Maksimov chose the book with the title “Aesthetics” and Gvozdenovic picked up “Superficial”. Both had taken the books in order to use them for intervention of their own. Maksimov has used the book for creation of hand-written summary of re-approach of “aesthetics” in philosophy and theory, Gvozdenovic printed in the book dimensions of understanding of the contextualisation of “superficiality”. Installation “Superficial Aesthetics” acts as materialisation of seemingly impossible, but omnipresent connection between people: the magic moment when logic and intuition are becoming one. 

2 books, 14 prints of the insides. The installation was presented at the group exhibition “Love Will Tear Us Apart” at the HAL, Antwerp, Belgium in February 2015. 

This was posted 5 years ago. It has 0 notes.